Articles by David Palm copyright © 2014-15
[Links to other sites in support of specific ideas do not imply agreement with or endorsement of any view expressed thereon.]
- Sungenis Fails the CMB Alignment Challenge….Twice September 30, 2015
- Conspiracies — Yeah, That Sounds Reasonable August 6, 2015
- Sungenis Followers Double Down May 16, 2015
- The “Simple” and “Scary” Mindset of Robert Sungenis May 4, 2015
- Karl Keating’s “The New Geocentrists” May 1, 2015
- Geocentrism: Tempest in a Teapot or Theological Shipwreck? February 27, 2015
- Will the New Geocentrists take The CMB Alignment Challenge? February 14, 2015
- Yes, the CMB Misalignments Are a Problem for the New Geocentrists February 14, 2015
- Technical Article: The Derivation and Meaning of the CMB Anisotropy Vectors February 14, 2015
- The Politics of Promoting Geocentrism January 22, 2015
- Sungenis Gets Personal With “Anthony T” and Goofs Again January 20, 2015
- Context Anyone? The (Literally) Incredible Geocentrists Strike Again January 13, 2015
- Sungenis Botches the Math….Again! November 21, 2014
- Dr. Tom Bridgman Weighs in on Geocentrists Flunking the Lagrange Point Challenge November 14, 2014
- Elementary Physics Blunders in Sungenis’s Reply to Sky and Telescope’s Camille Carlisle November 7, 2014
- Protecting Faith From Pseudoscience, by Camille Carlisle October 31, 2014
- Geocentrists Peddling Alien Theology of Centrality October 24, 2014
- Geocentrists Significantly Mangle CMB Science October 21, 2014
- Geocentrism: A Dangerous Pseudo-Science by “Anthony T” October 6, 2014
- A Conspiracy Solved October 6, 2014
- "It not infrequently happens that something about the earth, about the sky, about other elements of this world, about the motion and rotation or even the magnitude and distances of the stars, about definite eclipses of the sun and moon, . . . and of other such things, may be known with the greatest certainty by reasoning or by experience, even by one who is not a Christian. It is too disgraceful and ruinous, though, and greatly to be avoided, that he should hear a Christian speaking so idiotically on these matters, and as if in accord with Christian writings, that he might say that he could scarcely keep from laughing when he saw how totally in error they are." –St. Augustine, The Literal Interpretation of Genesis 1:19–20, Chapt. 19
"No; that argument about man looking mean and trivial in the face of the physical universe has never terrified me at all, because it is a merely sentimental argument, and not a rational one in any sense or degree.
I might be physically terrified of a man fifty feet high if I saw him walking about my garden, but even in my terror I should have no reason for supposing that he was vitally more important than I am, or higher in the scale of being, or nearer to God, or nearer to whatever is the truth. The sentiment of an overpowering cosmos is a babyish and hysterical sentiment, though a very human and natural one.
But if we are seriously debating whether man is the moral center of this world, then he is no more morally dwarfed by the fact that his is not the largest star than by the fact that he is not the largest mammal.
Unless it can be maintained a priori that Providence must put the largest soul in the largest body, and must make the physical and moral center the same, 'the vertigo of the infinite' has no more spiritual value than the vertigo of a ladder or the vertigo of a balloon." (G.K. Chesterton, "Man in the Cosmos," The Illustrated London News, 19 February 1910)
- The insignificance of Earth was as much a commonplace to Boethius, King Alfred, Dante, and Chaucer as it is to Mr. H.G. Wells or Professor Haldane. Statements to the contrary in modern books are due to ignorance. . . . the spatial insignificance of Earth, [was] asserted by Christian philosophers, sung by Christian poets, and commented on by Christian moralists for some fifteen centuries, without the slightest suspicion that it conflicted with their theology (C. S. Lewis, Miracles, 78).